home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Light ROM 4
/
Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso
/
text
/
maillist
/
1995
/
0295.doc
/
000507_owner-lightwave-l _Sun Feb 26 12:21:58 1995.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-03-19
|
3KB
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave-l>
Received: by netcom6.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom)
id JAA01681; Sun, 26 Feb 1995 09:34:28 -0800
Received: from netcomsv.netcom.com by netcom9.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom)
id SAA03419; Sat, 25 Feb 1995 18:25:36 -0800
Received: from burner.UUCP by netcomsv.netcom.com with UUCP (8.6.9/SMI-4.1)
id SAA25272; Sat, 25 Feb 1995 18:21:54 -0800
Received: by burner.com (V1.17-beta/Amiga)
id <d4nt@burner.com>; Sat, 25 Feb 95 18:22:58 MST
Received: by meta.burner.com (V1.16/Amiga)
id AA009p3; Sat, 25 Feb 95 17:32:33 MST
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 95 17:32:33 MST
Message-Id: <9502260032.AA009p2@meta.burner.com>
References: <9502211417.AA29724@beta>
X-NewsSoftware: GRn 2.1 Feb 19, 1994
From: jkrutz@meta.burner.com (Jamie Krutz) ()
To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
Subject: Writing for fame/NAB get together (was Lightwave Pro disks & LIGHT-ROM)
Sender: owner-lightwave-l@netcom.com
Precedence: bulk
In article <9502211417.AA29724@beta> syndesis@beta.inc.net (Syndesis Corporation) writes:
> mark@fusion.MV.COM (Mark Thompson) sez:
>
> >Michael Meshew <michael@iglou.com> writes:
> >> I'm sure that John Gross and the writers for Lightwave Pro could easily find
> >> a more productive way to spend their time than to write and publish
> Lightwave
> >> Pro. It is their love for their work that shows in every issue and for
> >> that I feel lucky that Lightwave Pro exists.
> >
> >Well ya got that right. Considering the number of hours I end up putting into
> >each article and what I get paid for them, I almost might as well work at
> >Burger King. And as editor, John doesn't fair any better. I was asked to
> serve as
> >editor of LWPro while John works on the LW4 manual, and I respectfully declined
> >unless John couldn't possibly find someone else. It is definitely a labor of
> >love.
>
> Well, how come Jim Plant is so rich then? :-)
>
> Come on, Mark, you did it for the fame. Isn't that what Jim told you?
> That you didn't need the big bucks, because you could leverage these
> articles into your own business, where you'd have the privilege of
> working 18 hour days, and to hand over nearly 50% in taxes to the
> two-headed monster from Arkansas?
Is that why you used to write (and write well, I might add) for Amazing,
John (I assume it's John from Syndesis I'm addressing, apologies
if not)? :^)
And then you got your own business so you could work 18 hour
days and hand over nearly 50% in taxes to the Ron & George show
(at that time)?
I hope Jim continues to do well. Haven't written for him yet but
I've threatened to... ;^)
Regards,
-Jamie
BTW, anyone else going to NAB? Anyone for a LightWave lister's
get together?